Post by s e pearson on Oct 16, 2011 11:11:25 GMT -5
It is increasingly clear that the traditional formats of radical right organisation are in a not fit state to co-ordinate that political tendency’s efforts. Nor are they likely to be any time soon. Indeed there is an increasing body of opinion that says that they never were and never can be. This is unacceptable at a time when we are witnessing a rapidly developing social, political and economic crisis which has the potential to destroy the system the radical right has struggled against for a century.
The situation demands that the radical right makes an evolutionary leap in order that it can both influence events and so that it can play its part in the current global resistance movement. Without the contribution of nationalist populism it is unlikely that the attempt to overthrow the corrupt elites of the West will be successful, few revolutions have succeed without that contribution.
Autonomous nationalism is the only game in town for the radical right at this point. Fortunately there already exists some infrastructure which is in a position to develop and promote this concept. The British Resistance group operates independently of any centralised organisations conducting discussion and information sharing/distribution on several platforms. The group is none hierarchically organised with all associates having complete freedom to use the platforms of the group as they see fit. Structurally the British Resistance is already operating and in accordance with the principles of autonomous nationalism. Whilst this is a product of simple expediency rather than ideological principle all that is required is the group to recognise its own strengths and characteristics.
I propose that the British Resistance expands its self imposed remit taking on missions to organise and coordinate the radical right, or an element of it, efforts. I further advocate the group experiment with organisational structures with the aim of developing legitimacy in order that it can speak with authority. Which is to say that it attempts to expand its group of associates as much as possible and then through a consensual or democratic process issues strategic, tactical and ideological advice to the radical right as a whole.
Revolution is not a spectator sport and the British Resistance group can’t afford to restrict itself to the role of commentator given the gravity of the situation. The path propose is one which there are many obstacles, which may prove insurmountable, and which guarantees opposition and ridicule from certain quarters. Never the less since there appears to be no other group or organisation capable, at least in such a good position to make the attempt, and the need is so pressing I submit that it would be tantamount to cowardice not to attempt it.
I suggest that formal discussions on strategic and organisational considerations are held as soon as possible and that they be publicised through the British Resistance communication channels with an invite to all to participate.
The situation demands that the radical right makes an evolutionary leap in order that it can both influence events and so that it can play its part in the current global resistance movement. Without the contribution of nationalist populism it is unlikely that the attempt to overthrow the corrupt elites of the West will be successful, few revolutions have succeed without that contribution.
Autonomous nationalism is the only game in town for the radical right at this point. Fortunately there already exists some infrastructure which is in a position to develop and promote this concept. The British Resistance group operates independently of any centralised organisations conducting discussion and information sharing/distribution on several platforms. The group is none hierarchically organised with all associates having complete freedom to use the platforms of the group as they see fit. Structurally the British Resistance is already operating and in accordance with the principles of autonomous nationalism. Whilst this is a product of simple expediency rather than ideological principle all that is required is the group to recognise its own strengths and characteristics.
I propose that the British Resistance expands its self imposed remit taking on missions to organise and coordinate the radical right, or an element of it, efforts. I further advocate the group experiment with organisational structures with the aim of developing legitimacy in order that it can speak with authority. Which is to say that it attempts to expand its group of associates as much as possible and then through a consensual or democratic process issues strategic, tactical and ideological advice to the radical right as a whole.
Revolution is not a spectator sport and the British Resistance group can’t afford to restrict itself to the role of commentator given the gravity of the situation. The path propose is one which there are many obstacles, which may prove insurmountable, and which guarantees opposition and ridicule from certain quarters. Never the less since there appears to be no other group or organisation capable, at least in such a good position to make the attempt, and the need is so pressing I submit that it would be tantamount to cowardice not to attempt it.
I suggest that formal discussions on strategic and organisational considerations are held as soon as possible and that they be publicised through the British Resistance communication channels with an invite to all to participate.